FILSAFAT MORAL IMMANUEL KANT: Suatu Tinjauan Paradigmatik

Islah Gusmian

Abstract


The ethics taught in Pre-Kant era was eudemonistic. The
nature of moral proposed by Kant was the awareness of the obligation,
absolute obligation. But there was no relationship between obligation
and happiness. Actually Kant did not reject the acts which came from
positive feelings, but rejected the acts appeared from the feelings. Kant
emphasized that the real moral awareness independently appear when
there is no natural tendensi or social habit. If a person show his/ her
honesty from the deepest of his/ her heart, then he/she has the moral
value. There is a possibility that being honest came from the social
oppression. Kant, also claimed that people obey and follow an
obligation in which they do not have beliefs. Those are the reasons of
Kant as quoted on the statement “das moralische Gesetz in mir“


Keywords


Kant, moral, and obligation

Full Text:

PDF

References


Anthony F. Falikowski, Moral Philosophy, Theories, Skills and

Application, News Jerse: Prentice hall, Inc, 1990.

Franz Magnes-Susesno, 13 Tokoh Etika, Sejak Zaman Yunani Samapi

Abad ke-19, Yogyakarta: kanisius,

Harun Hadiwijono, Sari Sejarah Filsafat Barat 2, Yogyakarta: Kanisius,

Jostein Gaarder, Dunia Sufi, terj. Rahmani Astuti Bandung: Mizan,

K. Bertens, Pengantar Etika Bisnis, Yogyakarta, Kanisius, 2000.

Paul Edward (ed.), The Encyclopedia of Philosophy, New York: Mac

Millan Inc., 1972, vol. 3 &4.

S.P. Lili Tjahjadi, Hukum Moral, Ajaran Immanuel Kant Tentang Etika

dan Imperatif Kategoris, Yogyakarta: Kanisius, 1991.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.22515/ajpif.v11i2.1190

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.