SELLING-AND-BUYING TRANSACTION PATTERNS IN A TRADITIONAL MARKET: A GENERIC STRUCTURE POTENTIAL APPROACH

Fahmi Reza Alfani(1*),Sukarno Sukarno(2),Akhmad Haryono(3)
(1) 
(2) Universitas Jember
(3) Universitas Jember
(*) Corresponding Author
DOI : 10.22515/ljbs.v6i1.3466

Abstract

This research aimed to investigate the patterns of selLing-and-buying transactions in a traditional market. The data sources of this research were the the sellers and the buyersin beef, chicken, fruit, grocery, and vegetable shopsof Pasar Waru, a traditional market, in Sidoarjo, Indonesia. The data were in the form of transactional conversations between the sellers and the buyers. Qualitative method was applied in this research by using the formula of generic structure potential theory proposed by Halliday & Hasan (1985) to describe the patterns of buying-and-selling transaction in the market. The result shows that generic structure elements in some shops at Pasar Waru comprises: greeting (G), sale initiation (SI), sale enquiry (SE), sale request (SR), sale compliance (SC), sale (S), purchase (P), purchase closure (PC), and finish (F). The grocery, beef, and chicken shop had a similar structure of G^SR^SC^S^P^PC, whereas the fruit shop showed its actual structure G^SI^SE^SR^SC^S^P^PC. Meanwhile, the vegetable shop had G^SI^SR^SC^S^P^PC structure.  As a whole, the five shops produced generic potential structure [(G).^] [{ SR^ SC }^S^] P^PC.

Keywords


communication, selling-and-buying transaction, generic structure potential

References


Ansary, Hasan & Esmat Babaii. 2005. “The Generic Integrity of Newspaper Editorials: A Systemic Functional Perspective”. RELC Journal36 (3): 271-295

Ary, Donald, Lucy Cheser Jacobs, Christine Sorensen & Ashgar Razavieh. 2013. Introduction to Research in Education. 9th Edition. Wadsworth: Cengage Learning

Astuti, Sri Puji. 2014. “Prinsip Kerjasama dalam Wacana Jual Beli di Pasar Tradisional Perumnas Tlogosari Semarang”. Jurnal Humanika, 20 (2), 67-73

Astuti, Sri Puji. 2018. “Tegur Sapa Penjual dan Pembeli di Pasar Tradisional Surya Kusuma Semarang”. Nusa, 13 (1): 147-155

Chaer, Abdul & LeonyAgustina. 2010. Sosiolinguistik Perkenalan Awal. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta

Halliday, MAK & Ruqaiya Hasan. 1985. Language, Context And Text: Aspects of Language In A Social-Semiotic Perspective. Victoria: Deakin University

Haryono, Akhmad. 2015. Etnografi Komunikasi: Konsep, Metode, dan ContohPenelitian Pola Komunikasi. Jember: UPT Penerbitan UNEJ

Hayati, Cut Ansi Faradiba. 2018. “The Analysis of Generic Structures and Copy Elements in Online Shop Video Advertisements”. Passage, 6 (3): 37-56

Kyaw, Ae Mon & Xin Zhiying. 2019. “Exploring Generic Structure Potential of Selected Editorials in The Myanmar Times”. Language Literacy: Journal of Linguistics, Literature and Language Teaching 13 (2): 139-149

Keraf, Gorys. 2004. Komposisi: Sebuah Pengantar Kemahiran Bahasa. Flores: Nusa Indah

Moleong, Lexy J. 2014. Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif. Bandung: PT Remaja Rosdakarya

Nurmiah. 2014. “Implikatur Percakapan dalam Transaksi Jual Beli di Pasar Tradisional di Kota Palu”. Multilingual 13 (2):196-207

Putranto, Kristiawan Dwi, Sigit Ricahyono & Rosita Ambarwati. 2018. “Generic Structure Potential of Rolling Stone Magazine Cover February 9th, 2006 Edition: Critical Multimodal Discourse Analysis”. English Teaching Journal: A Journal of English Literature, Linguistics, and Education 6 (1): 25-31

Sudaryanto. 2015. Metode dan Aneka Teknik Analisis Bahasa: Pengantar Penelitian Kebudayaan secara Linguistis. Yogyakarta: Duta Wacana University Press

Wahyuni, Latifah Dwi & Nisa Afifah. 2014. “Perbandingan Kesantunan di Pasar Tradisional dan Pasar Modern”. Prosiding Prasasti: 78-83. Surakarta: Pascasarjana UnIversitas Negeri Sebelas Maret


Article Statistic

Abstract view : 172 times
PDF views : 98 times

Dimensions Metrics

Article History

Submited : 7 March 2021
Revised : 14 December 2021
Published : 27 June 2021

How To Cite This :

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.