Generation Z on the Choice of Religious Authorities: A Case Study of Religious Communities in Yogyakarta
Abstract
The Internet emergence among generation Z in Yogyakarta portrays a unique phenomenon in selecting religious preachers. This research investigates how generation Z perceives religious authority. The formulation is answered by Carette’s psychological-religious experience theory. This is a descriptive qualitative research describing the phenomenon of generation Z in perceiving religious authorities. The objects were 15 respondents from 6 religious communities in Yogyakarta. The data were collected through questionnaire and interviews to gain in depth analysis and analyzed through collective case study. The research reveals: first, those who utilize internet as their main resource put more belief on new preachers such as Abdul Somad, Felix Xiaw, etc. and believe that traditional kyais hold less Islamic spirit; and second, those who utilize internet as their additional resource respect more traditional kyais such as Mustofa Bisri, Buya Syafii Maarif, etc. who emphasize on Islam Nusantara, and consider that new preachers hold rigid Islamic values.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Argyle, M. (1997). The psychological perspective on religious experience. Religious Experience Research Centre. Retrieved January 2, 2019, from http://repository.uwtsd.ac.uk/367/
Badan Pusat Statistik. (2017). Jumlah Perguruan Tinggi 1, Mahasiswa, dan Tenaga Edukatif (Negeri dan Swasta) di Bawah Kementrian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan Menurut Provinsi tahun ajaran 2013/2014-2014/2015. Retrieved April 10, 2019, from https://www.bps.go.id/statictable/2015/09/14/1839/jumlah-perguruan-tinggi-mahasiswa-dan-tenaga-edukatif-negeri-dan-swasta-di-bawah-kementrian-pendidikan-dan-kebudayaan-menurut-provinsi-2013-2014-2014-2015.html
Carrette, J. (2007). Religion and critical psychology: the ethics of not-knowing in the knowledge economy. London: Routledge taylor & Francis Group,
Cline, A. (2018). Types of religious authority: Communication, structuring, and wielding of power. Retrieved April 9, 2019, from https://www.learnreligions.com/types-of-religious-authority-250743
Hamil, J. & Smith, C. (1998). Religious authority and public opinion on the right to die. Sociology of Religion, 59(4), 373-391.
Heida, C. & Teusner, P. (2011). Religious Authority in the Age of the Internet. Texas: Center for Christian Ethics at Baylor University,
Heida, C. (2015). Understanding the relationship between religion online and offline in a Networked society. Texas: Center for Christian Ethics at Baylor University.
Intan, N. (2018). Generasi millenial belajar agama lewat media sosial. Retrieved April 9, 2019, from https://www.republika.co.id/berita/dunia-islam/islam-nusantara/18/02/26/p4r6pf282-generasi-millenial-belajar-agama-lewat-media-sosial-part1
James, W. (2009). The varieties of religious experience: a study in human nature. Adelaide: Adelaide University Press.
Kim, M. (2005). Online Buddhist community: an alternative organization in the information age: in religion and cyberspace. London: Routledge.
McBride, M. (2016). A rational choice theory of religious authority. Rationality and Society, 28(4), 410–438. DOI: 10.1177/1043463116658870
Mudzhar, M., A. (2011). Perkembangan Islam liberal di Indonesia. Retrieved April 9, 2019, from https://balitbangdiklat.kemenag.go.id/posting/read/552-postingreadperkembangan-islam-liberal-di-indonesia
Proctor, J., D. (2005). Science, religion, and the human experience. Oxford: University Press.
Siddiqui, S. (2016). Religion and psychoanalysis in India: critical clinical practice. London: Routledge taylor & Francis Group, 2016.
Vanderstoep, S., W. & Deirdre D., J. (2009). Research methods for everyday life. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Webb, M. (2011). Religious experience. Retrieved April 9, 2019, from https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/religious-experience/
Zaenudin, A. (2018) Kompetisi di Antara Berbagai Situsweb Islam. Retrieved April 11, 2019, from https://tirto.id/kompetisi-di-antara-berbagai-situsweb-islam-cEHi
DOI: https://doi.org/10.22515/shahih.v4i1.1656
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.