PARADIGMA INTEGRASI-INTERKONEKSI DI TENGAH KOMPLEKSITAS PROBLEM KEMANUSIAAN
Abstract
This article tries to describe the concept of integration-interconnection of science as a meeting point to integrating the mind and revelation. A concept which is positioning human mind and revelation as entities that are not dichotomous, but as relationships that complement to each other, as well as an effort to answer the complexity of the human problems which require a comprehensive and holistic process of settlement. Through critical-analytical studies of the concepts of integration-interconnection of science from various experts, the results of the study show that the term, forms, and implementations of this scientific paradigm are very diverse. Integration is not a single paradigm concept that is suitable in various life contexts, but a dynamic concept. The context in which human a being live will determine the patterns and forms of integration. Space and time, the types of problems and needs, and human creativity in responding the various life problems greatly determine the format and form of this paradigm.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Abdullah, M. Amin. Islamic Studies di Perguruan Tinggi: Pendekatan Integratif-Interkonektif. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar, 2006.
Aminuddin, Luthfi Hadi. “Integrasi Ilmu dan Agama : Studi atas Paradigma Integratif- Interkonektif UIN Sunan Kalijaga Yogjakarta.” Kodifikasia 4, no. 1 (2010): 181–214.
Andriyaldi. “Epistimologi Integrasi Interkoneksi Keilmuan Perspektif Imam Syatibi.” In Proceeding International Seminar on Education, 59. Batusangkar: Fakultas Ilmu Tarbiyah dan Keguruan, IAIN Batusangkar, 2016.
Arsyad, Azhar. “Buah Cemara Integrasi dan Interkoneksitas Sains dan Ilmu Agama.” Hunafa 8, no. 1 (2011): 2.
———. “Integration Tree and the Interconnectivity of Science and Religion.” Kalimah 14, no. 2 (2016): 115–138.
Darda, Abu. “Integrasi Ilmu dan Agama: Perkembangan Konseptual di Indonesia.” At-ta’dib 10, no. 1 (2015): 36.
Fahmi, Muhammad. “Tantangan Interkoneksi Sains dan Agama di IAIN Sunan Ampel.” Jurnal Pendidikan Islam 2, no. 2 (2013): 320–337.
Ismail, Roni. Integrasi Interkoneksi Keilmuan Sunan Kalijaga: Sebuah Interpretasi dan Aplikasi. Yogyakarta: Bagian Akademik UIN Sunan Kalijaga Yogyakarta, 2013.
Kafid, Nur. “Ma’had Sebagai Role Model De-Radikalisasi.” DINIKA: Journal of Islamic Studies 13, no. 2 (2015): 21–33. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/303406893
Karwadi. “Integrasi Paradigma Sains dan Agama dalam Pembelajaran Aqidah (Ketuhan): Telaah Teoritis dari Perspektif Kurikulum Integratif.” Jurnal Penelitian Agama 17, no. 3 (2008): 526.
Kuntowijoyo. Islam Sebagai Ilmu. Yogyakarta: Tiara Wacana, 2006.
Machali, Imam. “Pendekatan Integrasi-Interkoneksi dalam Kajian Manajemen dan Kebijakan Pendidikan Islam.” Jurnal eL-Tarbawi 8, no. 1 (2015): 47.
Mubarak, M Zaki. “Dari NII kei ISIS Transformasi Ideologi dan Gerakan dalam Islam Radikal di Indonesia Kontemporer.” Epsiteme 10, no. 1 (2015): 78–98.
Muslih, Mohammad. “Integrasi Keilmuan: Isu Mutakhir.” Kalimah 14, no. 2 (2016): 250.
Nur, M. “Revivalisasi Epistemologi Falsifikasi.” In Right 2, no. 1 (2012): 1.
Siswanto. “Perspektif Amin Abdullah tentang Integrasi Interkoneksi dalam Kajian Islam.” Teosofi 3, no. 2 (2013): 278.
———. “Perspektif Amin Abdullah tentang Integrasi Interkoneksi dalam Kajian Islam.” Teosofi 3, no. 2 (2013): 376–409.
Waston. “Pemikiran Epistemologi Amin Abdullah dan Relevansinya bagi Pedidikan Tinggi di Indonesia.” Profetika 17, no. 1 (2016): 64.
Yaqin, Ainol. “Integrasi Ilmu Agama dan Sains: Kajian atas Pemikiran Alghazali.” Islamuna 3, no. 1 (2016): 48.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.22515/ajpif.v15i2.1462
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.