Wajah IAIN Surakarta di Mata Masyarakat Pucangan
Abstract
This study aims at describing the Pucangan society in Kartasura district towards IAIN Surakarta. High education influences social change either positive or negative effects. This study employs the qualitative method, whereas main sources of this research take for granted derived from Pucangan society, which is interviewed. This study looks at institute’s influences from many aspects such as religion, social, economics, and education. The results show Pucangan society perception towards IAIN Surakarta existence, so there must be an effort to establish a positive image of IAIN Surakarta in Pucangan society.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Alexander, Jeffrey C. (1988). Action and Its Environments. New York, Columbia University Press.
Atkins, S., Lewin, S., Smith, H., Engel, M., Fretheim, A., & Volmink, J. (2008). Conducting a meta-ethnography of qualitative literature: lessons learnt. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 8, 21. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-8-21
Berger Peter dan Luckman, Thomas. (1990) ”Tafsiran Sosial Atas Kenyataan Risalah Tentang Sosiologi Pengetahuan”. LP3ES, Jakarta.
Geertz, C. (1992). Tafsir Kebudayaan. Yogyakarta: Penerbit Kanisius.
Ishomuddin. 2005. Sosiologi Perspektif Islam. Malang. UMM Press
Koentjoroningrat. (1983). Manusia dan Kebudayaan di Indonesia. Jakarta. Djambatan
Liebenau, J., & Lee, A. (1996). “Information System and Qualitative research.” The Lancet, 348(9020), 127–128.
Maslow, Abraham H. (1970). Motivation and Personality. English: Harper & Row, Publishers, Inc.
Nasution Harun. (1986). Teologi Islam, Aliran-Aliran, Sejarah Analisa Perbandingan. Jakarta: UI-Press
Rakhmat, Jalaludin. (2004). Metode Penelitian Komunikasi. Bandung: Rosda Karya.
S, Himes J. dan Moore. (1968). Study of Sociology. Atlanta: Scott Foresman.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.22515/shahih.v2i2.1050
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.